Skip to main content
Falstech.
Microsoft cloud service

Azure Foundation

A governed Azure foundation with documented ownership and a practical path for onboarding workloads.

All services
When this fits

Signs you need this.

  • Everything lives in one subscription and nobody wants to touch it.
  • There's no naming or tagging standard, so nobody can tell what a resource is for.
  • RBAC is a handful of Owner assignments and shared accounts.
  • More teams or workloads are arriving, but the current structure has no clear onboarding pattern.
  • A customer or assessor asked how the tenant is governed and the answer is spread across people and screenshots.
First

What we assess.

  • Current subscription and resource-group topology against the Cloud Adoption Framework.
  • Identity and RBAC model — who has what, and where standing access should be removed.
  • Network layout, address-space planning, and exposure of public endpoints.
  • Existing naming, tagging, and policy coverage.
  • Cost ownership — whether spend can be attributed to a business unit today.
Then

What we implement.

  • An agreed management-group and subscription structure.
  • A role model that reduces unnecessary standing access.
  • The connectivity pattern included in scope, such as hub-and-spoke networking or private endpoints.
  • A naming, tagging, and Azure Policy baseline for agreed resource types.
  • A documented cost-ownership model aligned to available business data.
Deliverables

What you get.

  • Landing-zone architecture and implementation
  • Subscription topology + RBAC design
  • Hub-and-spoke network with private endpoints
  • Naming, tagging, and Azure Policy baseline
  • Cost-ownership model

What the engagement requires and where it ends.

Usually a focused current-state assessment followed by a fixed-scope implementation. Ongoing governance support can be scoped separately.

Client inputs

  • Access appropriate to the agreed assessment or implementation scope
  • Current subscription, identity, network, and ownership information
  • Named technical and business decision-makers
  • Known constraints, change windows, and workload dependencies

Explicit exclusions

  • 24/7 operations, service desk, or managed-cloud support
  • Application migration or remediation unless included in the written scope
  • Certification, audit opinion, or a guarantee that a framework requirement is satisfied

Handoff

  • Current-state and target-state architecture
  • Decision records and implementation artifacts
  • Ownership, exception, and operational guidance
  • Knowledge-transfer session for the receiving team
Stack

Technologies.

Azure Landing ZonesManagement GroupsAzure PolicyMicrosoft Entra IDVirtual NetworkPrivate EndpointsBicep
Questions

Frequently asked.

What is a landing zone, in plain terms?
It's the pre-built, governed foundation your workloads land on — the subscription structure, identity model, networking, and policy guardrails set up once so every future project inherits them instead of reinventing them.
Do we have to move our existing workloads to get value?
No. The foundation is built alongside what you already run. We can migrate existing resources into the governed structure incrementally, or leave them in place and apply governance where it matters most first.
What is CAF and why does it matter?
The Cloud Adoption Framework is Microsoft's published guidance for structuring Azure adoption. Relevant design areas provide a useful reference, but the target state still needs to account for your access model, risk, workloads, and operating constraints.

Ready to start?

Start with a focused discovery conversation about the environment, pressure, access, and outcome. Pricing is provided after that conversation or a paid assessment when more evidence is required.